Government pulled u-turn on accommodation supplementby Jane Patterson
Fears of rent rises saw a plan to boost to the accommodation supplement shelved two years ago. But it's been resurrected.
However, ministers have since changed their mind, introducing an increase of up to $80 a week for some families in last week's Budget.
The changes are to due to come into effect from next April. People who would benefit the most are those on lower incomes living in cities like Auckland.
But advice from officials from the 2015 Budget showed the decision was made not to raise the accommodation supplement that year because they could not be sure tenants would get the benefit of the extra money.
The concerns about what were described as "landlord capture" were contained in advice from officials at the Treasury and the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet.
That year, benefit payments were increased by $25 a week, but a plan to raise the accommodation supplement was shelved after officials concluded the risk rents would just be raised as result was too great.
"Some of the lower cost, more targeted AS [accommodation supplement] options could also have been included in the package, but concerns about the risk of landlord capture of the assistance and fiscal cost led to them being set aside," said the officials.
Greens co-leader Metiria Turei said nothing had changed since then.
"Just increasing the accommodation supplement without also engaging in a major state house building programme for those on lower incomes means that most of that money will go straight from the government to the landlords."
Both Labour and the Greens actually support the increases to the accommodation subsidy in the Budget, but Labour leader Andrew Little said it was problematic.
"As a means of assistance it is pretty crude and in times of a housing shortage ... simply ploughing more money into assisting people to pay their rapidly rising rent actually in the long run is going to force rents up."
A few hours after the Budget was released one property investment advisor, Newland Burling and Co., posted on Facebook the news was good for property investors who were "feeling the pinch between sluggish rental income and increasing outgoings such as rates, insurance and repairs."
However, Andrew King, the executive officer of the Property Investors' Federation, said landlords would not necessarily know which tenants were actually getting the subsidy.
And he believed many people wrongly assumed the payment went straight to the landlord, and that they would ill be able to put up the rent if the accommodation supplement was increased. "Even some government officials may believe that - or assume, or think, 'the tenant has got the accommodation supplement, therefore they might put the rent up'."
But he said that did not really happen in practice.
Finance Minister Steven Joyce said the possibility of landlords pocketing the increase was considered by the government before the Budget was finalised and government agencies would be keeping a close eye on the market.
He said research done by the Ministry of Social Development since 2015, looking at the market response when the supplement was last increased in 2005, found no evidence landlords took advantage of the higher subsidy.
RNZ has requested a copy of the research from the ministry.
This article was originally published by RNZ.
It's an overdue voice for Aboriginals and was wildly misinterpreted by those who should know better.Read more
Small businesses are vital to New Zealand’s economy, but efforts to understand them continue to fall short.Read more
Team New Zealand’s grinders use their legs; Oracle’s use their arms, as did the grinders on every other boat that took part in the America’s Cup regatRead more
Winston Peters wants New Zealanders in the regions to benefit more from the wealth they help generate.Read more